Appropriate for response to all kinds of informality issues: disclaimer, improper specimens, identification of goods and services, entity type clarification, mark descriptions, translations, filing basis, and other procedural issues
Appropriate for response to substantial refusal or argument against examiner's oponion: Refusal on basis of descriptiveness, geographic significance, surname, or other substantive objections; Assertion of acquired distinctiveness; Refusal on basis of ornamentation; or other refusals exclude likelihood of confusion
Appropriate for response to office actions that including refusal based on likelihood of confusion. Our trademark experts would normally draft 7 to 13 pages of argumentation to convinced the USPTO to approve your application.
If you are New to LegalHoop,please just enter your contact email and create a password;
If you already have a LegalHoop account,please enter your account's email and password.